I’m working on a science question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Assignment Overview

The chemical energy stored in a battery is converted to electrical energy which is used to power numerous items we use in our daily lives, such as cell phones and calculators. In this assignment, you are going to tap into chemical energy.

Complete the instructions for the deliverable you selected:

Lemon Battery Report

Project 4: Protecting the Homeland
Step 9: Provide Digital Forensic Expert Testimony

In the previous step, you synthesized the information and data from all sources during the summit to create a Compilation Report-Out document. In this step, you will use that report as the foundation for the Expert Testimony Video. Review these expert testimony questions; you are required to answer each question in the testimony video.

Each digital forensic investigator will appear in a moot court setting to provide expert testimony video on the information and data collected throughout this course. Testimony will be presented to a panel of judges, to include the CISO and digital forensic investigators from the other FVEY nation teams. Testimony will evaluate national cybersecurity policy and present well-reasoned conclusions, based on the Compilation Report-Out.

When you have completed the Expert Testimony Video, your team should submit it for feedback. To submit your video, upload it to YouTube, paste the URL in a document, and upload the document to the assignment folder by following the instructions below. For further guidance on uploading video to YouTube, refer to the following resource: Converting PowerPoint and Uploading to YouTube.

4. Expert Testimony Video

 Presentation that needs to cover the following:

I. What are the legal challenges associated with cyber

incidents involving foreign countries? How do internal

laws affect eDiscovery? Reference and discuss all

international laws that may influence a forensic

investigation in the country that your team is assigned.

II. What are the legal challenges of accessing and retrieving

electronic evidence stored on foreign soil? Assuming cloud

storage was used, what procedures were followed to

access and retrieve digital evidence stored in the cloud?

III. Specific to the country that your team was assigned, how

did the international laws and jurisdictions influence the

processes and procedures followed during the forensic

investigation?

IV. What conflicts arose between ethics and international

laws during the forensic investigations? How did these

conflicts affect the investigations? How were the conflicts

mitigated/resolved?

V. What steps were taken to protect United States soil and

citizens during the international investigation? Describe

any risks to the country, businesses, or citizens from your

investigations.

You will write a short essay, 1-2 pages in length, detailing the parts of the scientific method discussed in your article and comparing that information to what was reported in the news story. Each entry will be written in a logical and professional manner using the APA template attached to the post.

The entire entry must be written IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Direct quotes of the articles are not allowed. However, when you summarize or paraphrase something from one of the articles you will need to provide an in-text APA reference.

The essay must be written entirely in third person. DO NOT USE FIRST OR SECOND PERSON. This means you cannot use the words “I”, “we”, or “you”.

ntroduction (1 paragraph)

This section identify which of the two articles was the scientific study and the subject of the scientific study. You will also identify the problem or observation that spurred the research. DO NOT LIST THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY ITSELF HERE. You will identify the hypothesis the scientists were testing. Remember that a hypothesis is a testable educated guess. Thus, it is not appropriate to pose a question here. However, while reading your articles, it can be helpful to ask yourself what explanation scientists tried to use to explain their initial observation. You will then transition into the body of the journal.

Body (~1 paragraph each)

Here, you will identify the test or experiment that was performed to address the hypothesis. You should be detailed here. It may be helpful to pull from other sources, if you do not fully understand how the experiment was conducted. After detailing how the experiment was done compared to how it reported in the media, you will transition into a discussion of the results.

In this section of your entry you will identify the experimental results that the scientists obtained. What did the scientists find after doing their experiment? Again, you can be detailed here. After detailing the results, you will transition into the conclusion sections.

The last paragraph of the body should explain the conclusion of the study. You should address whether the hypothesis was supported or rejected, and how the results led to that finding. Also provide a possible new avenue of research the scientists might pursue based on what was discovered in this study.

Evaluation (1 paragraph)

Here you will signal the end of your entry. In this section you will identify the new study about the scientific study and discuss whether or not the news story was a representative reporting of the scientific study. Did the news change anything or leave out something important from the scientific study? Summarize the important content from your entry, then you will end with a definitive final statement.

Constructing your journal entry

In addition to the criteria above, you will be graded on the quality of your writing; please write with proper grammar, punctuation, and style. The essay will be graded using the Dialogues of Learning Written Communication Rubric.

All sources (including the original 2 articles) should be properly documented. You must include an APA style reference page. Your TurnItIn score should be below 20 for this assignment.

The journal includes the following processes and requirements:

• Start with an engaging attention getter, identifying the observation/problem addressed by the media communication and in the scientific communication;
• Identify the media communication as a media communication/secondary source and the scientific communication as a scientific communication/primary source
• Write a valid hypothesis statement which is addressed by the research in the scientific article and explain if the hypothesis is presented correctly in the media source;
• Identify additional parts to the scientific method including research methods, results, and research conclusions comparing what is stated in the media source and the scientific source;
• End the journal definitively;
• Use paraphrased information, examples, and evidence to support all points;
• Properly organize information within and between paragraphs;
• Format layout, citations, and references in correct APA style.

How to Complete Yoru Journal

Below are attached a scientific study written by a group of scientists and a news article written by a journalist about the scientific study. You will evaluate how well the news article covers the scientific study.

The articles for paper are attached and the instruction of how to write it is also there