briefly discuss what legally constitutes exigent circumstances regarding  searches and seizures. In addition, provide examples of police conduct  that do not fall under the exigent circumstances rule and would  therefore be in violation of the Fourth Amendment. 

Are you pressed for time and haven’t started working on your assignment yet? Would you like to buy an assignment? Use our custom writing services for better grades. Even if your deadline is approaching fast, our writers can handle your task right when you need it. Our writers will complete your order from scratch and make sure it’s completely unique.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Please answer each question separately. One question per page two references

 

Question 1

briefly discuss what legally constitutes exigent circumstances regarding searches and seizures. In addition, provide examples of police conduct that do not fall under the exigent circumstances rule and would therefore be in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

 

Q2

briefly discuss the impact of the Edwards Rule pertaining to police interviewing and interrogation. In doing so, briefly provide an overview of the U.S. Supreme Court case, Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477  (1981).

Q3

briefly discuss the impact of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing. In doing so, also briefly discuss biometric analysis as it may pertain to criminal investigations.

Q4

briefly list and provide an overview of a few of the different types of sex crimes. In doing so, briefly discuss how an investigator should approach a possible sexual assault investigation.

Q1: Exigent circumstances refer to situations in which the police can make a warrantless search or seizure due to an emergency that requires immediate action to protect life, prevent serious damage to property, or prevent the destruction of evidence. Examples of police conduct that do not fall under the exigent circumstances rule and would be a violation of the Fourth Amendment include conducting a search or seizure without a warrant or without consent, or when there is no immediate threat to life, property, or the destruction of evidence.

Q2: The Edwards Rule is a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that established the right of a suspect to request an attorney during a police interview or interrogation, and that once a request is made, all questioning must immediately cease. The case, Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), involved a suspect who had requested an attorney but was later questioned without one. The court ruled that this violated the suspect’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to counsel and self-incrimination. The Edwards Rule has had a significant impact on police interrogation practices and the protection of suspects’ rights.

Q3: Forensic evidence plays a critical role in criminal justice case processing by providing scientific and objective evidence that can help identify suspects, establish timelines, and prove guilt or innocence. Biometric analysis refers to the use of physical characteristics, such as fingerprints, DNA, or facial recognition, to identify individuals or match evidence to a suspect. This can be especially important in criminal investigations where physical evidence is critical to solving a case.

Q4: Sex crimes refer to a range of offenses that involve sexual misconduct, such as rape, sexual assault, sexual harassment, and child pornography. An investigator should approach a possible sexual assault investigation with sensitivity and empathy towards the victim, while conducting a thorough and impartial investigation to gather evidence and identify potential suspects. This may involve interviewing witnesses, collecting physical evidence, and conducting forensic testing, among other techniques. It is also important for investigators to be aware of the potential biases and stereotypes that may affect their investigation and to take steps to avoid these pitfalls.

Q1: Exigent circumstances refer to situations in which the police can conduct a search or seizure without a warrant. Legally, exigent circumstances are situations that require immediate action to prevent harm to people or property, or to prevent the escape of a suspect. Examples of situations that may constitute exigent circumstances include hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect, destruction of evidence, or a risk to public safety. Police conduct that does not fall under the exigent circumstances rule includes warrantless searches conducted without any legal justification, such as searches for the sole purpose of harassment or to gather evidence for a case.

Q2: The Edwards Rule is a legal precedent established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Edwards v. Arizona, which requires police officers to honor a suspect’s request for counsel before initiating any further interrogation. If a suspect invokes their right to an attorney during police questioning, the police must stop the interrogation and wait until the suspect has had an opportunity to consult with an attorney. The Edwards Rule provides an important protection for suspects, ensuring that they have access to legal representation and are not coerced into making self-incriminating statements during questioning.

Q3: Forensic evidence can have a significant impact on criminal justice case processing, providing critical information that can help identify suspects, link them to a crime, and support or refute alibis. Biometric analysis, which includes the use of fingerprints, DNA, and other physical characteristics, is an increasingly important tool in criminal investigations. Biometric evidence can be used to match suspects to crime scenes, identify victims, and rule out innocent parties. It is important to note, however, that the collection and analysis of biometric evidence must be done carefully and with appropriate safeguards to protect the rights of the individuals involved.

Q4: Sex crimes encompass a wide range of offenses, including sexual assault, rape, sexual abuse, and sexual exploitation. Sexual assault investigations require a sensitive and thorough approach, focusing on the needs of the victim and gathering evidence to support or refute allegations. Investigators should begin by ensuring the safety and well-being of the victim, providing support and resources as needed. They should then collect physical evidence, interview witnesses, and pursue other leads to identify potential suspects. It is important that investigators are trained to handle sexual assault cases with sensitivity and professionalism, recognizing the serious and potentially long-lasting impact that these crimes can have on victims.

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? Even when your task is complicated and the deadline is in less than 2 days, you still have every chance to get a good grade for it. How? By completing the order form, you will get the finest custom-written assignment at an affordable price. We also deliver a number of services for free (e.g., revisions, editing, checking the text for authenticity). Use our paper writing service to receive effective help with your homework.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper