need paper written 19
Are you pressed for time and haven’t started working on your assignment yet? Would you like to buy an assignment? Use our custom writing services for better grades. Even if your deadline is approaching fast, our writers can handle your task right when you need it. Our writers will complete your order from scratch and make sure it’s completely unique.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
TOPIC TO USE : deforestation in the amazon 2019
|
Exploratory/Inquiry Essay [1000 words minimum] [20% OF FINAL GRADE] [First draft due for peer review Friday February 21st; final draft due Sunday February 23rd] Assignment Objectives You are required to express a question or problem about a specific topic about the natural physical environment; present relevant information from multiple reliable sources; and analyze the contributions of your identified sources toward an answer or solution (though this need not be conclusive). Rationale Exploratory essays pose questions or problems. Identifying articles, essays, books, film or television, or visual artwork that contribute information that may ultimately provide answers or solutions is a key part of the preparatory process for researched writing. Although the findings from a single source will rarely be conclusive, you will have engaged in this assignment in inquiry about a topic and have pulled together relevant information that can be shared with an appropriate audience. Assignment Global warming, desertification, deforestation, loss of biodiversity, and disposal of wastes, along with other environmental issues have been of great concern. Choose an environmental topic that matters to you. How does this issue impact your local community? The nation? Is it of global significance? Do I need a works cited page? Because you will be quoting, paraphrase, and summarizing from a source, you will need to parenthetically cite it when you use it in your essay and include an MLA works cited page with an entry for source. Please ask if you have questions regarding citations, and remember that all essays will go through the Turnitin Originality Check in the D2L Dropbox. Rubric Name: Exploratory EssayThis table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
Expert
Integration of Knowledge
4 points
The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
3 points
The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.
2 points
The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
1 point
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course.
/ 4
Topic focus
4 points
The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.
3 points
The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.
2 points
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
1 point
The topic is not clearly defined.
/ 4
Depth of discussion
4 points
In-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper.
3 points
In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper.
2 points
The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.
1 point
Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections.
/ 4
Cohesiveness
4 points
Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
3 points
For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
2 points
Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow – disjointedness is apparent. Author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
1 point
Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships
/ 4
Spelling and grammar
4 points
No spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
3 points
Minimal spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
2 points
Noticeable spelling & grammar mistakes.
1 point
Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
/ 4
Sources
4 points
More than 4 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
| |
