Output and Costs
Are you pressed for time and haven’t started working on your assignment yet? Would you like to buy an assignment? Use our custom writing services for better grades. Even if your deadline is approaching fast, our writers can handle your task right when you need it. Our writers will complete your order from scratch and make sure it’s completely unique.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
OUTPUT AND COSTS
Average total cost
(175,000 cattle = 100) |
|
|
|
||
Year |
50,000 cattle |
175,000 cattle |
425,000 cattle |
850,000 cattle |
1,350,000 cattle |
1992 |
1.104 |
100.0 |
94.3 |
90.6 |
88.5 |
1977 |
1.082 |
100.0 |
95.8 |
93.1 |
91.7 |
1963 |
1.045 |
100.0 |
98.0 |
98.0 |
96.7 |
Question #1:
The data in the table above show the average total costs (per head of cattle) of meatpacking firms of varying plant sizes in three different years. (MacDonald, James M. and Ollinger, Michael E. “Technology, Labor Wars, and Producer Dynamics: Explaining Consolidation in Beef Packing.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(4) (November 2005): 1020-1033.) The average cost numbers are expressed as an index, using the 175,000 head plant size as the base, so a decrease in the index is a decrease in average total cost.
Explain how these data indicates the existence of economies of scale in the beef packing industry. Are there economies of scale for each of the three years? Describe the general shape of the average cost curve that is implied by these data.
Question #2:
Compare the average costs across plant sizes in 1963 with those in 1977 and 1992. Were scale economies becoming more or less significant over time?
Question #3:
The authors of this study made the following assessment of production costs in the beef packing industry:
“Large plants have substantial fixed costs, due partly to capital intensity, and partly to labor practices (weekly minimum hours guarantees to production workers). As a result, short run processing costs at large plants rise sharply as volumes fall below capacity, and packers require large and consistent flows of cattle before committing to a large plant.”
To capture the idea that there are substantial fixed costs, suppose that the formula for the beef packers total cost is:
TC = $50,000,000 + $35 x Q
where Q is the number of cattle processed per year. This formula means that the fixed cost is $50 million, but that once the plant is up and running, the marginal cost per cattle processed is $35, regardless of the level of production.
a. Is this marginal cost curve from this cost formula consistent with the law of diminishing returns? Explain.
b. Using the formula for the total cost, what is the formula for the average total cost?
c. Is there a level of output for which the marginal cost equals the average total cost?
Do you need help with this or a different assignment? Even when your task is complicated and the deadline is in less than 2 days, you still have every chance to get a good grade for it. How? By completing the order form, you will get the finest custom-written assignment at an affordable price. We also deliver a number of services for free (e.g., revisions, editing, checking the text for authenticity). Use our paper writing service to receive effective help with your homework.
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
Do you need help with this or a different assignment? Even when your task is complicated and the deadline is in less than 2 days, you still have every chance to get a good grade for it. How? By completing the order form, you will get the finest custom-written assignment at an affordable price. We also deliver a number of services for free (e.g., revisions, editing, checking the text for authenticity). Use our paper writing service to receive effective help with your homework.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper