Are you pressed for time and haven’t started working on your assignment yet? Would you like to buy an assignment? Use our custom writing services for better grades. Even if your deadline is approaching fast, our writers can handle your task right when you need it. Our writers will complete your order from scratch and make sure it’s completely unique.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
he Supreme Court is analogous to a mirror. The events of the day are reflected and refracted via the extremely controversial litigation that appears before the High Court every year. During the 1960s, civil rights cases appeared before the Supreme Court and directly led to many of the civil freedoms experienced today. The tumultuous 1970s saw the explosion of lawsuits challenging presidential authority related to the Vietnam War. And, of course, in the post-9/11 environment, the Supreme Court has heard many cases relating to the war on terror, both domestically and internationally. Major cases have already been decided concerning the treatment of those captured in assaults against Al Qaeda and its allies. Many of these Supreme Court decisions have ramifications for the legislative and executive branches of government. Some modern seminal cases include:
- Brown v. Board of Education (1954) (race-segregated schools are unconstitutional)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) (establishes right to counsel)
- Roe v. Wade (1973) (legalizes abortion and establishes right to privacy)
- U.S. v. Nixon (1974) (sets limits to executive privilege)
- Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) (corporate contributions to political campaigns are protected by the First Amendment)
- National Federation of Business v. Sebelius (2012) (Affordable Care Act is constitutional)
- U.S. v. Windsor (2013) (Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional)
In this Assignment, you select a Supreme Court case in a policy area of interest to you. Then, you analyze the majority and dissenting opinions and evaluate the future impact of the Court’s decision on the policymaking of the other two branches of government.
Write a 3- to 5-page double-spaced paper in which you do the following:
- Briefly describe the Supreme Court case you selected.
- Synthesize and summarize the majority and dissenting opinions of the Court in this case.
- Analyze the ramifications of the decision on the policymaking of the other two branches of government.
- Include three additional scholarly resources published in the last three years, in addition to citing this week’s Learning Resources.
- Cite all resources in APA format.
Blackstone, B. (2013). An analysis of policy-based congressional responses to the U.S. Supreme Court’s constitutional decisions. Law & Society Review, 47(1), 199–228. Treanor, W. M. (2005). Judicial review before Marbury. Stanford Law Review, 58(2), 455–562.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Unah, I. (1996). The Supreme Court’s institutional stature and role in public policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 24(4), 679–685. Wiist, W. H. (2011). Citizens united, public health, and democracy: The Supreme Court ruling, its implications, and proposed action. American Journal of Public Health, 101(7), 1172–1179.
National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health And Human Services, et al., 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012). Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-393c…Note: Given the complexity of the decision, you are to read the majority and dissenting opinions. Review the other parts of the decision at your discretion.
Oyez Project. (n.d.). Retrieved April 28, 2014, from http