week 3 en 304 8c english composition ii

Are you pressed for time and haven’t started working on your assignment yet? Would you like to buy an assignment? Use our custom writing services for better grades. Even if your deadline is approaching fast, our writers can handle your task right when you need it. Our writers will complete your order from scratch and make sure it’s completely unique.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Unit 3 Assessment Notetaking

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 65
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

Practice: Notetaking

Evaluation Title: Notetaking

Select one of these articles for your assignment from the Herzing University Library database.

Article Choices:

Chapman, B., Erdozaim, M. S., & Powell, D. (2017). Going public: early disclosure of food risks for the benefit of public health. Journal of Environmental Health, 79(7), 8+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA483929867&asid=b1e06b2cd03c7e93decba66ed572ea3f (Links to an external site.)

Etchegary, H., Bishop, L., Street, C., Aubrey-Bassler, K., Humphries, D., Vat, L. E., & Barrett, B. (2017). Engaging patients in health research: identifying research priorities through community town halls. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1). Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA485047658&asid=8e2af3a345db1d309573ca163cfc87ad (Links to an external site.)

Michaelis, T. L., & Markham, S. K. (2017, March-April). Innovation training: making innovation a core competency: a study of large companies shows that, although managers see human capital as central to innovation success, most aren’t providing innovation training. Research-Technology Management, 60(2), 36+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA487431647&asid=8e5306a1b58b8578b3459457df11df89 (Links to an external site.)

Miller, K. L. (2017, March). What we talk about when we talk about “reasonable cybersecurity”: a proactive and adaptive approach. The Computer & Internet Lawyer, 34(3), 1+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA483743679&asid=bd0f63af3132e3bea47730789cab551e (Links to an external site.)

Read the article using your chosen model of note taking (from Unit 2).
Using the identified article, provide the following information:

  • A title page in APA format
  • A 1-2 page summary-includes the APA reference for the article chosen.
  • An abstract for the article
  • A Thesis/Claim statement
  • Identify 2 additional articles (1 must be from the Herzing Library Database) that could be used to support the Thesis/Claim statement included in the summary.

Provide the APA reference for each article.

Set up the assignment as follows:

I. Title Page
II. 1-2 page Summary
III. Abstract
IV. Thesis Claim Statement
V. Article reference

Estimated time to complete: 6 hours

Rubric

Unit 3 Assessment Notetaking

Unit 3 Assessment Notetaking

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentEN304-CO4; ENC304-CO3

20.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

20.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

10.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

6.0 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

2.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

1.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

4.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

3.5 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

3.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

2.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 65.0

Next

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? Even when your task is complicated and the deadline is in less than 2 days, you still have every chance to get a good grade for it. How? By completing the order form, you will get the finest custom-written assignment at an affordable price. We also deliver a number of services for free (e.g., revisions, editing, checking the text for authenticity). Use our paper writing service to receive effective help with your homework.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper