week 6 course project milestone 3 assignment

/in /by

Are you pressed for time and haven’t started working on your assignment yet? Would you like to buy an assignment? Use our custom writing services for better grades. Even if your deadline is approaching fast, our writers can handle your task right when you need it. Our writers will complete your order from scratch and make sure it’s completely unique.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Purpose

To apply lessons in quality improvement in nursing to a real-world nursing issue. This Course Project will use the Six Sigma DMAIC process.

Course Outcomes

The Course Project enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes (COs):

  • CO1: Identify the role of the BSN nurse in the quality improvement process as a member of the collaborative interprofessional team. (POs 2 and 7)
  • CO2: Discuss effective processes and strategies to improve quality in nursing. (POs 2 and 8)

Points

The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 3 is worth 225 points of this total.

Due Date

Submit your completed NR392 Milestone 3 by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, end of Week 6.

Requirements and Guidelines

  1. Download the required Milestone 3 Template (Links to an external site.).
  2. Save it to your computer in Microsoft Word 2013 (or later) as a .docx file with the file name: Your Last Name NR392 Milestone 3.docx.
  3. Milestone 3 is a continuation of and builds upon Milestones 1 and 2. Review the grading criteria and grading rubric for details about requirements.
  4. A peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (not a website) that is appropriate to the nursing care issue must be obtained from CINAHL via the Chamberlain Online Library and must be available in full text. Provide the required information about the article in the template. You will write a short summary of this article.
  5. Carefully review the assigned areas for Milestone 3 and type directly in your saved required Milestone 3 Template.
  6. Watch the video for a detailed overview of the requirements of Milestone 3.

  1. Submit your completed Milestone 3 Template by Sunday, end of Week 6.

Reminder

Before preparing your assignment, please review this “Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.)“ resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarly writing, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to your instructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment.

NR392 – Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 Assignment

NR392 – Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 Assignment
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBrief Statement of Nursing Care IssueState the nursing care issue that is the approved topic for the course project.
25.0 pts

Clearly and briefly states the nursing care issue that is the approved topic for the course project.

 22.0 pts

Statement of the nursing care issue is mostly clear and mostly brief.

 20.0 pts

Clarity and/or brevity are only fair for the statement of the nursing care issue.

 10.0 pts

Clarity and brevity are poor. May or may not state the same topic approved from previous milestones without approval for topic change by instructor.

 0.0 pts

Did not state the nursing care issue.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeI: Intervention to Improve Quality of This Nursing Care IssueDesign one intervention to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
50.0 pts

One intervention is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent. Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue.

 44.0 pts

Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue.

 40.0 pts

Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair.

 19.0 pts

Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor.

 0.0 pts

Did not submit intervention.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeI: Professional Article to Support InterventionInclude all required information for reference.
50.0 pts

All required information (authors, year, article title, journal name, volume number, issue number, page numbers, and DOI if available) is provided for very appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text).

 44.0 pts

All required information (see list at left) is provided for mostly appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text).

 40.0 pts

All required information (see list at left) is provided for somewhat appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text). Some required information may be missing.

 19.0 pts

Several items of required information (see list at left) are not provided OR article is not appropriate to the nursing care issue, not peer-reviewed, OR not available in CINAHL in full text. OR may not submit multiple required parts of information

 0.0 pts

Did not submit information about article. required information.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeI: Article SummarySummarize clearly and thoroughly
50.0 pts

Summary is very clear and thorough in 80-100 words.

 44.0 pts

Summary is mostly clear and thorough in 80-100 words.

 40.0 pts

Summary is fairly clear and thorough in 80-100 words OR summary is slighty shorter or longer

 19.0 pts

Summary is unclear and/or not thorough AND summary is significantly shorter or longer.

 0.0 pts

Did not submit a summary.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC: Control/ EvaluationExplain appropriate evaluation plan for intervention
50.0 pts

Explains very appropriate evaluation plan for Intervention provided above using excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality of the nursing care issue is improved by the intervention.

 44.0 pts

Explains mostly appropriate evaluation plan for Intervention provided above using good depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality of the nursing care issue is improved by that intervention.

 40.0 pts

Explains fairly appropriate evaluation plan for Intervention provided above using fair depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality of the nursing care issue is improved by that intervention.

 19.0 pts

Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue and intervention OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality of the nursing care issue will be improved.

 0.0 pts

No evaluation plan provided.

50.0

Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? Even when your task is complicated and the deadline is in less than 2 days, you still have every chance to get a good grade for it. How? By completing the order form, you will get the finest custom-written assignment at an affordable price. We also deliver a number of services for free (e.g., revisions, editing, checking the text for authenticity). Use our paper writing service to receive effective help with your homework.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper